Hybrid Analysis Engine

AI.Detect

Analyze student responses against assignment prompts to identify AI-generated content and hallucinations.

This AI can and will hallucinate so check your students' work before punishing them.

Assignment Prompt
Student Response
⚠
Em Dash Detected in Prompt
The assignment prompt contains em dashes (—), which are a common hallmark of AI-generated text. If this prompt was written by a teacher or copied from a human source, em dashes are unusual. Consider whether the prompt itself may have been AI-generated — this could affect the baseline used for analysis.
+
Add optional context
Improves accuracy

Providing additional context, a general human exemplar, or a previous confirmed human-written response from the same student helps the model calibrate its analysis more accurately — especially for unusual assignment styles, subject-specific writing conventions, and individual writing habits.

Extra Context / Notes Optional
Exemplar Human Response Optional
⚠
Em Dash Detected in Exemplar
The exemplar response contains em dashes (—), which are a common hallmark of AI-generated text. This may indicate the exemplar itself was AI-written, which would skew the calibration and reduce analysis accuracy.
Previous Confirmed Human Response From Same Student Optional
⚠
Em Dash Detected in Student Baseline
The previous response contains em dashes (—). If this baseline was actually AI-assisted, the style comparison may become less reliable.
Analysis Results
Composite scoring: The dashboard displays 6 analytical metrics. The total AI score out of 100 is calculated by adding up the 5 core area scores (worth 20 points each): AI-like patterns, hallucination/fabrication risk, instruction mismatch, generic writing, and style difference. The 6th metric tracks specific detected issues as flags.
Analysis was calibrated using optional context, a benchmark response, and/or a same-student writing sample.
—
Composite AI Score
—
AI-like Patterns
—
Hallucination / Fabrication
—
Instruction Mismatch
—
Generic Writing
—
Style Difference
—
Detected Issues
—
—
Detected Issues
Style Comparison With Previous Student Writing
Detailed Analysis

AI Detection Analysis Report

Generated on:

Project Link: Ai Detector Github

Composite AI Score:

Detailed Analysis

Metrics Breakdown

  • AI-like Patterns: /20
  • Hallucination Risk: /20
  • Instruction Mismatch: /20
  • Generic Writing: /20
  • Style Difference:

Detected Issues (Flags)

    Analyzed Text & Context

    Assignment Prompt:

    Student Response Analyzed: